METR System --> METR Rule-Maker/Agent:
METR feedback

Definitions

METR feedback (Information Flow): This flow supports the presentation of issues requiring corrective actions necessary before information entered into a METR Regulation Center, can be approved. This flow can also be used to alert the rule translation agent that the METR Regulation Center has become aware of either a user-identified or system-identified discrepancy with previously distributed METR information which may require corrective actions. METR feedback can also be used to inform the rule translator agent of a newly discovered physical rule for further analysis and approval.

METR System (Source Physical Object): The 'METR System' creates and maintains electronic versions of traffic rules, regulations, ordinances and statutes that have official status and must be understood by all motor vehicle operators and intelligent vehicles that operate at higher automation levels. This system represents multiple authorities that operate at local, regional, state, and national levels and represents organizations that establish, manage, and enact the traffic code. Each electronic rule is approved, signed, and traceable to a specific rule-maker. Rules are independently verified. Any identified or reported rule discrepancies are analyzed, investigated, and addressed.

METR Rule-Maker/Agent (Destination Physical Object): The 'METR Rule-Maker/Agent' represents the entity that has the legal authority to establish and digitally sign approved METR rules. An agent is the person that enters the electronic version of the rule into the METR system.

Included In

This Triple is in the following Service Packages:

This Triple is described by the following Functional View Functional Objects:

This Triple is described by the following Functional View Data Flows:

  • None

This Triple has the following triple relationships:

None

Communication Solutions

No communications solutions identified.

Characteristics

None defined


Interoperability Description
Not Applicable Interoperability ratings don't apply per se to some types of interfaces like human interfaces. These interfaces may still benefit from associated standards (e.g., ergonomic and human factors standards for human interfaces), but the primary motive for these standards is not interoperability.

Security

Information Flow Security
  Confidentiality Integrity Availability
Security levels have not been defined yet.


None defined